By Herman M. Lagon
In a world that often turns to titles, uniforms and reputations for reassurance, it’s easy to assume that those in power must always be right.
We’re taught early to trust the doctor, the teacher, the elder, the politician. But sometimes, our trust goes too far — crossing into blind faith.
That’s where the “appeal to authority” fallacy quietly slips in: When we accept something as true simply because someone in power says it, not because the evidence actually backs it up.
Sure, experts matter. Experience matters. But no one — no matter how high their rank or how long their résumé — is above question. Critical thinking still has to lead the way.
Take politics, for example. Here in the Philippines, we often hear longtime public officials defend controversial decisions with something like, “I’ve been in service for two decades — I know what works.”
It sounds reassuring, but tenure alone doesn’t make a decision right or ethical. Years in office don’t automatically translate to good governance.
As political analyst Richard Heydarian reminds us, real leadership is measured not by how long someone has served, but by how their work has improved people’s lives.
This kind of thinking isn’t limited to politics. It shows up in our homes, too.
Picture a family argument where a parent or elder shuts down a younger person’s opinion with, “I’ve lived longer — I know better.” It’s a familiar script. In Filipino culture, respect for elders runs deep.
But that respect shouldn’t come at the cost of silencing valid, thoughtful perspectives. As psychologist Dr. Honey Carandang once said, age should be a source of guidance — not a wall that blocks meaningful dialogue.
Then there’s the public sphere, where influence and popularity are often mistaken for expertise. Celebrities telling us what vitamins to take. Politicians weighing in on medical treatments. Social media personalities offering legal advice. Just because someone is famous — or loud — doesn’t mean their word is gospel. When it comes to public health, education or policy, we need more than charisma. We need data, research and transparency.
During times of crisis, these fallacies can even shape national decisions. Imagine an official brushing off public concerns with, “I’m your elected representative — I know what’s best.” That might sound firm, even comforting to some. But it’s also a subtle way of dodging accountability. In truth, leadership isn’t about being unquestionable. It’s about being answerable.
Even in schools and classrooms, the appeal to authority can be quietly damaging.
When students are told to stop asking questions and just “trust the teacher,” it discourages curiosity. It teaches compliance over inquiry. But education should be the opposite — it should welcome challenge and foster independent thinking. As Unesco has emphasized, 21st-century learning must be rooted in open, critical engagement — not blind obedience.
So how do we protect ourselves from falling into the trap of authority-based thinking?
Start by asking: Where’s the evidence? If a government official claims a new policy will reduce poverty, let’s ask: What research supports that? If a teacher insists on a certain method, let’s ask why it works and for whom. If a brand says its toothpaste is “No. 1 recommended,” let’s look at who’s doing the recommending — and what that even means.
Campaign season also brings this fallacy into full view. Candidates love name-dropping endorsements: “I’ve got the bishop’s blessing,” or “This senator backs me.” But we need to look beyond the name. What policies are they pushing? What’s their track record? Endorsements might suggest trust, but they don’t replace the need for truth.
Even in advertising, we’re constantly nudged by so-called experts. “Nine out of 10 dentists recommend …” we hear. But who are these dentists? How was the study done? Do we know enough to believe it? It’s not about being cynical — it’s about being informed.
At its heart, this is about choosing discernment over deference. Just because someone says it doesn’t make it true. And if they really are credible, they should be able to show us why. Authority that rests on truth doesn’t need to demand obedience — it earns trust.
When we ask better questions, we become better citizens, better family members, better learners. It’s not about challenging for the sake of ego, but for the sake of understanding. As individuals and communities, we grow stronger when we listen with open minds, but also weigh what we hear against facts.
Spotting an appeal to authority fallacy isn’t about being argumentative — it’s about being thoughtful. It’s about recognizing that truth, more often than not, is built on evidence — not just on who delivers it.
Because in the end, titles fade. Positions change. But the truth — when rooted in fact — has a way of holding steady, no matter who’s speaking.
***
Doc H fondly describes himself as a “student of and for life” who, like many others, aspires to a life-giving and why-driven world grounded in social justice and the pursuit of happiness. His views do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions he is employed or connected with./WDJ